More on Mazikim

Among the various things that, we learn, were created on the eve of the first ever Shabbat (Avot 5:8) are mazikim. ArtScroll editions of Avot translate this word as "destructive spirits". Other contenders include "demons" (Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks, Judah Goldin), "vandals" (Me'am Loez), "evil spirits" (Hyman Goldin), or leave it untranslated.

Back in October 2020, in "Mazikim pt 2: Refusal to Admit Responsibility for What Happens in One's Life" I discussed the notion that mazikim were not demons or evil spirits at all, but a coded or metaphorical manner of indicating the damage we cause through a refusal to face up to our own faults and deficiencies. In this context I'd like to quote the words of the late Chief Rabbi Joseph Hertz in his book Sayings of the Fathers (1945, discussed in a post last week at xxx). He too denies the real-world existence of mazikim as separate entities, but links them to man's yetzer hara, the inclination of every human to do wrong. He writes:

Demons figure in Rabbinic folk-lore, and belief in their reality was widespread; but, as here, they are held to be absolutely the creatures of God... Later Jewish teachers--the Gaon Samuel ben Chofni (died 1034) and Abraham ibn Ezra (1104-1167)--are among the first in the history of the world to deny the existence of demons. ...[D]emons, e.g. the forces of temptation and unrest in man, date from the dawn of Creation, and are part of the equipment of the human soul from its birth. It is true that, when these forces dominate us, they are "destroying spirits". But when these instincts are properly controlled, when we rule them, they are the driving forces in life. It is the capacity to fight evil, or to succumb to evil, that distinguishes man from the brute. And it is because of evil and suffering and temptation, that life is the glorious battlefield it is. We are at once the combatants and the combat and the field that is torn with strife.

These are powerful, emotive words which graphically invoke the inner conflicts that reflect the human condition. Chief Rabbi Hertz then offers a note of hope:

But in this struggle we are not left groping in the dark. Simultaneously with the destroying passions of man, the "Tables of the Law" together with "The Writing on the Tables" [these being other items listed in the same mishnah as being created on the eve of the first Sabbath] were created. As those instincts towards evil are part of the original constitution of man, so also are conscience and the holy laws of right and wrong, that are to control those instincts.

Is it not so much better, so much more constructive, for a person to bear these words in mind and apply them to his or her thoughts and deeds, rather than to cower in fear of non-existent demons.

***************************************

See also the related blogpost Mazikim pt 1: What are they and how do we deal with them?

Mazikim pt 2: Are we the real mazikim?

Continued from the previous post.

I believe that the real question we face is not that of whether mazikim exist. Rather, we should be asking what we can learn from the incontrovertible fact that the author of the mishnah at Avot 5:8 teaches us that there are those who say that mazikim were created on the eve of the World’s first Sabbath.

It seems to me that an argument can be made out that the inclusion of mazikim on the list of last-minute creations is because their presence has a positive aspect, in common with the other thirteen creations that are listed in this mishnah.

Let us start by asking another question: how do you “know” that you have received a visit from a mazik? The tell-tale sign of a mazik’s impact on a person’s life is that something adverse has happened to him. That person has, at the instant he realizes this, a choice of how to think. But what is this choice?

One option is for someone who has suffered a misfortune to link that adverse consequence to his own conduct. This can be done in many ways and on different levels. For example he can accept that the damage he suffered was because he was negligent (e.g. the car rolled down the hill because he didn’t check if the brake was on) or inadvertent (e.g. he switched the kettle on, forgetting that he had previously emptied it). He can also view the adverse consequence as a sort of retribution (e.g. why did he drop the bottle of Scotch in the street? Because he should have spent the money instead on a charity donation that he declined to give) or caution (e.g. he walked into an old lady while checking his phone and knocked her over, this being a warning to him to be more careful next time he goes out).

The other option is to blame it all on the mazikim. By blaming the mazik he satisfies himself that his misfortune is quite unrelated to his own behaviour. Let us return to the examples above. Why did the car roll down the hill? Because a mazik released the handbrake. Why did the kettle boil dry? Just his luck that a mazik must have distracted him! That Scotch bottle? Not my fault. And as for the old lady, a mazik must have pushed her into my path or she would have taken care to avoid me.

When a person is prepared to take responsibility for his actions, he recognizes that it is he who is the mazik. Why did that bottle of Scotch fall from my hands? Maybe it was a lesson – annoying and expensive but at least it was painless – that I should think again about putting my own selfish interests ahead of the needs of others. Why did I knock that poor little old lady over? Because I was so preoccupied with my own affairs that I forgot I was sharing the sidewalk with my fellow humans. So, to summarize, mazikim are listed as a sort of shorthand term for the potential of mankind to accept or reject responsibility for its own damaging actions.

The significance of mazikim in this mishnah is that this concept was created just before Shabbat of the World’s first week. The Torah is not a history book, but it does tell us in some detail about one event of crucial significance: the Fall of Man.

Our thoughts concerning the story of Adam and Eve tend to dwell on the sadly lost opportunity to do the one thing God asked of them: to refrain from eating the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. This mishnah however addresses another part of the story: the abrogation of responsibility on the part of both Adam and Eve for their wrongful acts. Adam states that it was not his fault: it was a mazik, Eve, who gave him the fruit. Eve states that it was not her fault: it was a mazik, the serpent, who told her to eat it.

Here then, with Shabbat coming in for the first time in history, we see the meaning of this mishnah and its teaching for contemporary readers: it tells of the potential for either accepting or denying responsibility for our own damaging actions.

Creation, kindness, and an apparently irrelevant detail

Avot 5:8 teaches that 10 things were created on the eve of the first Shabbat, though it ultimately raises the total to 14 (listed below). So what?

From our viewpoint as inhabitants of the 21^st century, it makes little practical difference to our daily lives whether the 14 things listed in this Mishnah were created just as the Six Days of Creation were drawing to their close, earlier in the week or even after the first Shabbat. In any event, our consumerist habits tend to direct our attention towards when things expire or pass their use-by date, not the precise moment in time in they were manufactured. The mishnah however teaches nothing in vain. So why do we need to know this detail? Rabbi Yehudah Assad, Chidushei Mahari’a al Pirkei Avot, explains that this apparently redundant piece of information teaches that all 14 of these creations reflect God’s chesed (kindness) towards His people.  How is this so?

A verse in the Book of Psalms records in part that “[In] kindness the World is created” (89:3), What is the significance of this? This verse hints that, when God created the World, he did so during the hours of daylight. Day is divided into 12 hours. Six days of 12 hours duration gives a total of 72 hours. The word for “kindness” in Hebrew is חֶסֶד (chesed). The numerical value of the Hebrew word חֶסֶד is also 72 and twilight on the Sixth Day of Creation represents the point at which the 72^nd and final hour of the working week literally shades off into night. The 14 creations in our Mishnah were therefore brought into existence as a matter of chesed. 

This message might seem a little cute and contrived, but it carries a powerful point: if all these things were created as an act or sign of God’s kindness, then the damaging forces called mazikim [discussed at length on 13 October 2020 here] must have been created as an act of kindness too. Bearing this in mind, it is worth considering afresh what they are and why God should have troubled Himself to create them.

*********************************************

 The first 10 things are (i) the mouth of the Earth; (ii) the mouth of the well; (iii) the mouth of the ass; (iv) the rainbow; (v) manna; (vi) the staff; (vii) the shamir worm; (viii) writing; (ix) that which is written and (x) the tablets.

The four additional things are (xi) damaging entities (mazikim);  (xii) the burial place of Moses and (xiii) Abraham's ram -- and some say also (xiv) tongs that are made with tongs.

Mazikim pt 2: Refusal to admit responsibility for what happens in one's life

In the fifth perek of Avot (at 5:8) we learn of 10 things that were created at dusk on the eve of Shabbat and of a further four things that some people would add to this list. One of those things is "mazikim", evil and destructive demons. Some people believe that mazikim exist; others that they do not. 

Should the existence or non-existence of mazikim concern us? I think not. If they exist, it is axiomatic that God created them and that, since only man has free will, whatever mazikim do is mandated by God.  Furthermore, since God is the only authentic source of power that a Jew must acknowledge, it is absolutely wrong to treat mazikim as if they held any power in their own right, and therefore wrong to seek to propitiate them. If however they do not exist, then it is we who have created them in our minds. If we have done so, it is our own minds that we must turn in order to address their functional (or dysfunctional) utility within the World we inhabit and which God created.

 I believe the real question we face is not that of whether mazikim exist.  The real question is what we can learn from the undeniable fact that the author of this mishnah teaches us that there are those who say that they were created on the eve of the World’s first Sabbath.

 An argument can be made out that the inclusion of mazikim on this list is because it has a positive aspect, in common with the other 13. The argument runs as follows.  The idea behind the mazikim of our mishnah is that something adverse happens to an individual. That person has, at that moment, a choice. One option is to link that adverse consequence to his own conduct. This can be done in many ways and on different levels. For example he can accept that he was negligent (e.g. the car rolled down the hill because he didn’t check if the brake was on) or inadvertent (e.g. he switched the kettle on, forgetting that he already emptied it). On another level he can view the adverse consequence as a sort of retribution (e.g. why did he drop the bottle of Scotch in the street? Because he should have spent the money instead on a charity donation he was asked to give) or caution (e.g. he walked into an old lady while checking his phone and knocked her over, this being a warning to be more careful next time he goes out).

 What does all of this have to do with mazikim? In short, the idea that underwrites the usefulness of the mazik is that a person’s misfortune is unrelated to his own behavior: it is always the fault of others.  Let us return back to the examples above.  Why did the car roll down the hill? Because a mazik released the handbrake. Why did the kettle boil dry? Just his luck that a mazik must have distracted him.  If however a person is prepared to take responsibility for his actions, he recognizes that he is the mazik. Why did that bottle of Scotch fall from my hands? Maybe it was a lesson—annoying and expensive but at least it was painless—that I should think again about putting my own selfish interests ahead of the needs of others. Why did I knock that poor little old lady over? Because I was so preoccupied with my own affairs that I forgot I was sharing the sidewalk with my fellow humans. So, to summarize, "mazikim" is a sort of shorthand term for the potential of mankind to accept or reject responsibility for its own damaging actions.

 The significance of mazikim in this mishnah is that this concept was created just before Shabbat of the World’s first week.  The Torah is not a history book, but it does tell us in some detail about one event: the Fall of Man.  Our thoughts concerning the story of Adam and Eve tend to dwell on the sadly lost opportunity to do the one thing God asked: not to eat the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge. This mishnah however addresses another part of the story: the abrogation of responsibility on the part of both Adam and Eve. Adam’s position regarding their wrongful acts. Adam states that it was not his fault: it was Eve who gave him the fruit. Eve states that it was not her fault: the serpent told her to eat it. Here, with Shabbat coming in for the first time in Jewish history, we see the potential for accepting or denying responsibility for a person’s own damaging actions being actualized.