Showing posts with label Frequency of Avot citations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Frequency of Avot citations. Show all posts

Wednesday 19 June 2024

The Suffs that dreams are made on

Until earlier this week I had never heard of “Suffs” and had no idea what a suff was—but now I have been enlightened. The word “suff”, it appears, is an abbreviation of “suffragette”, the term originally bestowed on those brave women who fought and sometimes even gave their lives for the right of women to vote in national and local elections in the United Kingdom.  “Suffs” is an award-winning musical, created by Shaina Taub.

According to the Times of Israel:

Taub won awards for best book of a musical and best original score written for theater for the Broadway show about the women who fought to be able to vote in the United States. In her acceptance speech … she quoted a Jewish text that she said had a prominent place in her show’s literature.

“The epigraph on my script is a quote from the Talmud: You are not obligated to complete the work, but neither are you free to abandon it,” said Taub, who also plays suffragist Alice Paul in the show. She added, “This is a hard year in our country, and I just hope that we can remember that when we organize and we come together we are capable of making real change and progress for this country for equality and justice. And so I hope we can all do that together.”

The famous quotation, from Rabbi Tarfon, is found in the canonical text of Jewish ethics, Pirkei Avot [at Avot 2:21]. It is part of the Mishna, the code of oral law that is at the core of the Talmud. The saying has animated legions of Jewish activists, from acolytes of the late liberal Supreme Court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the acting attorney general at the end of Donald Trump’s presidency, who have sought to battle against steep odds to make change…

Shaina Taub’s award, and her acceptance speech, have been widely reported on the media. I know this not only because I have set my Google Alerts to Pirkei Avot but because so many people have kindly contacted me to tell me about it (A big “thank you” to all who did. I’d rather receive the same information several times over than risk missing it once). It’s gratifying to see the Ethics of the Fathers in the limelight, and anything that spreads the good word can only be for the best. But there is a bit of a downside too.

Anyone who uses Google Alerts for Pirkei Avot will know, as Avot Today has reported in the past, that Rabbi Tarfon’s teaching is one of the most frequently cited in the tractate. In 2022 only Hillel’s “If not now, when” mishnah (Avot 1:14) was the only one to gain more quotes and, in 2023, it topped the chart with 17 citations.

Whenever I see the words “You are not obligated to complete the work, but neither are you free to abandon it” online, I feel tempted to bet that the speaker is not a rabbi but a politician, businessman, or a campaigner for a special cause. This is because Rabbi Tarfon’s words are quoted only in part. He finishes it with the following words:

“If you have learned much Torah, you will be greatly rewarded, and your employer can be trusted to pay you the reward of your labour. And you should know that the reward of the righteous is in the World to Come”.

So what Rabbi Tarfon actually means is that (i) you're not obligated to finish your work of learning Torah because there's more Torah to learn than we can manage in our time on Earth [as Rabbi Tarfon says in the mishnah that immediately precedes this one] and that (ii) you're not free to abandon it because there is no cut-off point in one's life at which the Torah's obligations no longer apply, But this isn't quite what Ms Taub means.

I suppose I shouldn’t complain. There is a certain symmetry in the idea that campaigners with an abbreviated name should be encouraged to rally round an abbreviated battle-cry. Even so, I look forward to a time when politicians, businessmen and campaigners will be comfortable to speak Rabbi Tarfon’s words in full.

Check this post's Facebook page here for comments and discussions.

Monday 16 October 2023

And now for something a little different

Recent developments in Israel and the diaspora have generated a host of sombre social media posts and opinion pieces, as well as an impressive array of positive and inspirational material. Just for a change, here are three short items that are neither.

The bread and salt diet

From Claude Tusk comes what we can fairly describe as “food for thought”.

In Avos 6:4 it is taught: “Thus is the way of Torah: eat bread with salt…”. But in Kiddushin 62a, when expounding the words חֶרֶב תְּאֻכְּלוּ (“You shall be fed with the sword”: Isaiah 1:20), we learn: “Stale bread baked in a large oven with salt and onions is as harmful to the body as swords”.

Does that mean, Claude asks, that a Torah-true diet should not include onions, or is the quality of the bread the issue?


Top of the pops

As regular readers will recall, Avot Today keeps track of all the citations of mishnayot and baraitot in Avot that it can find on the social media, using Google Alerts. In the third quarter of 2023 (July to September) we counted 68 all told, July being the peak month with 28 cites.  The most popular Mishnah, with 5 ‘hits’ for this quarter and 17 for the year to date, was Rabbi Tarfon’s teaching at 2:21: “It’s not for you to finish the task, but neither are you free to withdraw from it”.  Next, on 4, is Ben Zoma at 4:1: “Who is strong? The person who can control himself”.  The biggest surprise was the decline in popularity of Yehoshua ben Perachyah’s teaching at 1:6 that we should judge others favourably. Last year it was on everyone’s lips, as it were, but it has only notched up 3 citations for the first nine months of 2023.

 

Fresh opportunity to go astray?

Rabban Gamliel, son of Rabbi Yehudah HaNasi, promotes the virtues of combining the study of Torah with a worldly occupation (a.k.a. a job) on the basis that the combination of the two causes sin to be forgotten (Avot 2:2). On this the Maharam Shik raises a point worth pondering. Ideally a person who learns Torah 24/7 shouldn’t be thinking of sinning at all. But if he is the sort of person who does contemplate sin, would it not be the case that splitting his time between learning and work will not stop him sinning at all, but will simply provide him with extra opportunities to sin in the workplace? Before you dismiss this as a facetious suggestion, ask if you have never come home with pens, stationery, customer samples or other items that did not belong to you. According to Incorp.com, employee theft and fraud cost US businesses between $20-50 billion annually—and then there is the temptation to stray beyond the bounds of acceptable behaviour towards one’s colleagues. If you want to stay on the straight and narrow, it might be safer to stay in the Bet Midrash…

For comments and discussion of this post on Facebook, click here.

Tuesday 10 January 2023

Mishnayot in the Media: which bits of Pirkei Avot get the most cites?

Throughout the calendar year 2022 I have tracked, with the aid of Google Alerts, as many references as I can find to Pirkei Avot that are posted on the internet, in newspapers and newsletters, on blogs and other websites. Admitttedly this exercise has been confined to English-language citations, so for 2023 I’m trying to locate citations in Hebrew too.

Using this methodology I found that Pirkei Avot received a total of 175 online plugs during 2022.  

Which of the illustrious Tannaim of Avot gets the most citations? Hillel comes out top with 28 name-checks, though he does have an advantage in that he has no fewer than seven mishnayot to his name and most of them have at least three teachings in them. Yehoshua ben Perachyah is next with 21: though he has only one mishnah to his name, 1:6, it is a very popular one. Third comes Ben Zoma (17) whose highly quotable four-part mishnah at 4:1 is much loved by controversialists who use it to stir up debate.

Not all the big-name Tannaim are heavily cited. Rabbi Akiva’s mishnayot scrape together just four mentions. Rabbi Meir gets just one and those stalwarts of the Mishnah Rabbis Eliezer and Yehoshua get none at all.

The most frequently-cited teaching in Avot is Hillel’s at 1:14 (“If I am not for me, who am I? And if I am only for me, what am I? And if not now, when?”), which was quoted 17 times. Curiously, it appears to have been popular with lay writers rather than rabbis, and is rarely quoted in a particularly Jewish context. Next most cited teaching is that of Rabbi Tarfon at 2:21 (“It’s not for you to finish the task, but nor are you free to desist from it”), which too was popular with non-rabbinical writers such as politicians. Third in popularity is Yehoshua ben Perachyah’s at 1:6 (“Judge all people meritoriously/favourably”).

By far the most popular perek was the first one, with 67. Trailing far behind were perakim 4 (39), 2 (33) and 3 (19).  Perek 5 and the baraitot that form perek 6 rarely make it online. The content of perek 6 is relatively short of neat, snappy quotes, but perek 5 has much good material that writers may have overlooked.

Predictably, there were more citations of Avot during the “season”, i.e. between the end of Pesach and Rosh Hashanah when Avot is still recited or studied in some synagogues, than there were in the winter. September and December were the quietest months for citations of Avot, while May and July were the busiest.

It is impossible to draw deep and meaningful conclusions from a survey of this type. We cannot ascertain, for example, why it is that some mishnayot are repeatedly cited, sometimes when their relevance is only tangential, while other mishnayot are not cited at all. Nor do we know whether the mere fact that some teachings are popular online means that they are read and therefore recycled by others without ever actually being learned. But those of us who care about Avot and worry about its neglect may want to ask whether we are able to do more to promote some of the lesser-known content of this important body of teaching and to ensure that Avot is seen as something more than a handy receptacle for media soundbites.

Friday 8 April 2022

Avot online: a media review

Whenever I see a reference to Pirkei Avot in the media, my interest is always piqued. I want to know why it is being cited, by whom and for what purpose. I ask myself “can I learn something from this citation?” Accordingly, since the beginning of the calendar year 2022, I have been conducting a review of citations of Pirkei Avot in the English-language online media.

The material I have reviewed includes Jewish local and national papers, synagogue and organisational newsletters and the occasional weblog (naturally excluding the Avot Today blog). Quite a lot of this material has nothing to do with religion in general or Judaism in particular: sayings from Avot crop up in political analyses and sports reports too.

With the aid of Google Alerts for ‘Avot’, ‘Avos’ and ‘Ethics of the Fathers’ and other search terms, I have picked up data from which I have the following findings on the citation of teachings from Avot cited online in the First Quarter of 2022:

The total number of citations of Pirkei Avot from 1 January to 31 March was 46 (18 in January, 11 in February and 17 in March).

As between the six chapters of Avot, the distribution of citations was as follows:

Perek 1: 17    Perek 4: 10        

Perek 2: 12    Perek 5: 3

Perek 3: 2      Perek 6: 2  

Which were the most popular mishnayot? Leading the pack with six citations is Avot 1:6 (Yehoshua ben Perachya: “make for yourself a rav, acquire for yourself a friend and judge all people by their merit”). Second place is shared by three contenders with four citations apiece: Avot 1:14 (Hillel’s “If not now, when?”); Avot 2:21 (Rabbi Tarfon: “It’s not for you to finish the work, but nor are you free to desist from it..”) and 4:1 (Ben Zoma: “Who is wise/strong/rich/honoured...?”). In fifth place, with three citations, is Shimon HaTzaddik’s teaching at Avot 1:2 (“The world stands on three things: Torah, service to God and acts of kindness”).

Hillel is actually the most frequently-cited contributor to Avot, which is unsurprising given that he is attributed as the author of seven mishnayot in Avot, more than anyone else. He has been cited a total of seven times, followed by Yehoshua ben Perachya on six, Rabbi Tarfon on five and Ben Zoma on four.

The first quarter also saw two mis-citations. One was the maxim of “Talmud Torah keneged kulam” (“the study of Torah is equivalent to all of them”), which belongs to Shabbat 127a and Pe’ah 1:1. The other was that words, like arrows, once shot cannot be called back (Midrash Tehillim 120).

The data set for this quarter was bound to be relatively small since the weekly recitation of chapters from Avot had not yet commenced. The "season" for Avot traditionally runs from Pesach through to Rosh Hashanah, so figures for the next two quarters should reflect far more references to its teachings.

I shall continue to keep an eye on Avot citations over the year, at the end of which I shall see what generalisations can be made about the use to which Avot is put and its utility as a source of wisdom and/or soundbites for authors of material published online