Tuesday, 1 July 2025

A concept decomissioned: fear of sin

At Avot 3:11 we find the first of three similar and arguably related teachings by Rabbi Chanina ben Dosa:

כֹּל שֶׁיִּרְאַת חֶטְאוֹ קוֹדֶֽמֶת לְחָכְמָתוֹ, חָכְמָתוֹ מִתְקַיֶּֽמֶת. וְכֹל שֶׁחָכְמָתוֹ קוֹדֶֽמֶת לְיִרְאַת חֶטְאוֹ, אֵין חָכְמָתוֹ מִתְקַיֶּֽמֶת

One whose fear of sin takes precedence over his wisdom—his wisdom endures. But one whose wisdom takes precedence over his fear of sin—his wisdom does not endure.

To the contemporary reader there is a sort of imbalance between the two halves of this equation. We all know what wisdom is. We value it, pursue it if we can, make great personal sacrifices in order to obtain it and are prepared to pay handsomely for the advice and guidance of those who have more of it than we do. Many of the most respected and highly-paid professions in the modern world are wisdom-based: physicians, lawyers, accountants, actuaries, economists provide obvious examples.

Fear of sin, in contrast, is a closed book to most people who live in the world today. The concept is incapable of bearing any meaning unless one first ascertains what is meant by “sin”, an idea that has faded from Western society along with the religion-based morality of what was once the domain of Christianity. While “fear of sin” still has some traction in those small pockets of society that practise Judaism, it cannot compete for popularity against the tide of moral relativism that promotes the notion that, if it feels right, do it because it’s right for you. For society at large, “fear of sin” is a concept that, to all intents and purposes, has been decommissioned and put out to graze in the Garden of Ideas that have Outlived Their Usefulness.

When this mishnah was first taught, its audience would have understood clearly that fear of sin meant fear of transgressing the laws and mores of the Torah. This could be viewed as fear of losing one’s Olam Haba (World to Come), fear of punishment or retribution, or fear of falling short of the expectations of a God who, though kind, merciful and forgiving of sin, was entitled to expect more of His people than that they throw His kindness back at him. But what is the connection between wisdom and fear of sin that demands that the former will not take root, as it were, in the absence of the latter?

Rabbi Shlomo P. Toperoff (Lev Avot) asks this question and offers an answer if, perhaps a little rhetorical, is also a little prophetic, given the way the world has evolved since he wrote these words in 1984:

“It is generally conceded that wisdom is pursued by many people today. We possess a plethora of schools, colleges and universities, but too often the wisdom acquired is divorced from the fear of sin, resulting in angry and rebellious students who are ready to overthrow the Establishment…

Wisdom built on the rock foundations of fear of sin will endure and save civilisation, but wisdom not preceded by fear of sin will eventually destroy the world”.

Like the mishnah, Rabbi Toperoff does not specify any particular sin. But in the quest for wisdom, one can hypothesize that no human understanding can pass the test of being regarded as wisdom unless it first confirms to the criteria of truth—and failure to respect and accept the truth is the sin that most effectively devalues anything that purports to be wisdom. Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel (Avot 1:18) already classes truth as one of the three virtues that is a necessary condition for sustaining the world, and the mishnah at Avot 5:9 stigmatises one who fails to accept the truth as a golem, an unformed, incomplete being.

The events on campus that have unfolded since 7 October 2023, conspicuously in the United States but also in many other countries, have shown that objective, analytical scholarship and debate have too often given way to selective use of sources, confirmation bias, fake news that is taken to be genuine until the contrary is proven, and the pre-emptive adoption of partisan conclusions that are accepted as being self-evident and therefore in no need of verification. One wonders how much of the accepted wisdom of the day will ever stand up to scrutiny in the long run, when scholarship based on fear of falsehood is allowed to have its say. Or will it all be too late by then?

For comment and discussion of this post on Facebook, click here.