Showing posts with label Gehinnom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gehinnom. Show all posts

Sunday, 8 June 2025

Gehinnom: Some like it hot...

Writing in this week’s Jewish Press, Rabbi Moshe Meir Weiss (“Investing in ‘Hell Insurance’”) writes:

Every month, we pray when we bentch Rosh Chodesh that Hashem should grant us “Yiras Shamayim v’yiras cheit – Fear of Heaven and fear of sin.” Practically speaking, fear of sin includes fear of punishment which results from our sins. Sometimes, that punishment translates into retribution in this world, primarily for sins between us and our fellow man. For sins against Hashem, we fear the frightening retribution of Gehinnom, “hell.” Since the Mishna in Pirkei Avos informs us that the fires of Gehinnom are 60 times hotter than the fires in this world, that means they are 60 times hotter than the oven in the matzah bakery. That’s very hot indeed! [emphasis added]

I was astonished to read this. There is no such mishnah in Avot and I consider it quite reprehensible for a rabbi, a teacher of Torah and a person whose qualifications and learning give him access to so large an audience, should so mis-state the content of Avot.

Gehinnom does get a mention in Avot. Thus in Avot 1:5 the chachamim in the mishnah of Yose ben Yochanan Ish Yerushalayim teach that

כָּל הַמַּרְבֶּה שִׂיחָה עִם הָאִשָּׁה, גּוֹרֵם רָעָה לְעַצְמוֹ, וּבוֹטֵל מִדִּבְרֵי תוֹרָה, וְסוֹפוֹ יוֹרֵשׁ גֵּיהִנֹּם

“…everyone who talks too much with his wife causes evil to himself, neglects his Torah learning, and his end is that he will inherit Gehinnom.”

This mishnah certainly does not refer to sins between man and God, and offers no indication as to the temperature of the netherworld.

Two further mishnayot in the fifth perek make reference to Gehinnom. The anonymous mishnah at Avot 5:22 concludes with a warning to the disciples of Balaam:

אֲבָל תַּלְמִידָיו שֶׁל בִּלְעָם הָרָשָׁע יוֹרְשִׁין גֵּיהִנֹּם וְיוֹרְדִין לִבְאֵר שַֽׁחַת, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: וְאַתָּה אֱלֹהִים תּוֹרִידֵם לִבְאֵר שַֽׁחַת, אַנְשֵׁי דָמִים וּמִרְמָה לֹא יֶחֱצוּ יְמֵיהֶם, וַאֲנִי אֶבְטַח בָּךְ

“…but the disciples of the wicked Balaam inherit Gehinnom and descend into the well of destruction, as it states: “And You, God, let them go down into the well of destruction—men of bloodshed and deceit, they will not live half their days. And, for my part, I will trust in you”.

This mishnah doesn’t even specify any transgressions that will condemn a person to Gehinnom; rather, it discusses bad attitudes.

A nearby mishnah, in the name of Yehudah ben Teyma ( Avot 5:24) also addresses bad attitudes, which is not surprising if one remembers that this tractate is about behaviour and attitudes rather than commandments and transgressions. It teaches:

עַז פָּנִים לְגֵיהִנֹּם, וּבֽוֹשֶׁת פָּנִים לְגַן עֵֽדֶן. יְהִי רָצוֹן מִלְּפָנֶֽיךָ, יְיָ אֱלֹהֵֽינוּ וֵאלֹהֵי אֲבוֹתֵֽינוּ, שֶׁיִּבָּנֶה בֵּית הַמִּקְדָּשׁ בִּמְהֵרָה בְיָמֵֽינוּ, וְתֵן חֶלְקֵֽנוּ בְּתוֹרָתֶֽךָ

“The brazen [go] to Gehinnom; the bashful, to paradise. May it be Your will, Lord our God and God of our fathers, that the Holy Temple be rebuilt speedily in our days; and grant us our portion in Your Torah”.

Neither of these two mishnayot amplify on the nature of Gehinnom. The source upon which Rabbi Weiss might wish to rely is a passage of aggadata in the Babylonian Talmud, at Berachot 567b. It reads there:

“Five things are a sixtieth part of something else: namely, fire, honey, Sabbath, sleep and a dream. Fire is one-sixtieth part of Gehinnom. Honey is one-sixtieth part of manna. Sabbath is one-sixtieth part of the world to come. Sleep is one-sixtieth part of death. A dream is one-sixtieth part of prophecy”.

The reference to Gehinnom is not picked up elsewhere in this sugya, which is located in the middle of a fascinating stream of consciousness passage on the substance, quality and meaning of dreams.

Without in any sense wishing to minimise the seriousness of offences against Hashem, I do feel that embellishing the message with non-existent references to Avot is not the best way to go about getting the message across.

For comments and discussion of this post on Facebook, click here.

Monday, 10 February 2025

Brazen effrontery

At Avot 5:24 Yehudah ben Teyma teaches, somewhat mysteriously:

עַז פָּנִים לְגֵיהִנֹּם, וּבֽוֹשֶׁת פָּנִים לְגַן עֵֽדֶן. יְהִי רָצוֹן מִלְּפָנֶֽיךָ, יְיָ אֱלֹהֵֽינוּ וֵאלֹהֵי אֲבוֹתֵֽינוּ, שֶׁיִּבָּנֶה בֵּית הַמִּקְדָּשׁ בִּמְהֵרָה בְיָמֵֽינוּ, וְתֵן חֶלְקֵֽנוּ בְּתוֹרָתֶֽךָ

The brazen-faced—to Gehinnom; the meek—to the Garden of Eden. May it be Your will, Lord our God and God of our fathers, that the Holy Temple be rebuilt speedily in our days; and grant us our portion in Your Torah.

In the previous mishnah the same Tanna urged us to be as brazen as a leopard in doing God’s will. Now he appears to be flagging the same attitude as possessing a negative quality.  Commentators have no trouble in reconciling the two teachings. If fulfilling God’s will is a desirable end, then there are times when one must adopt the posture of chutzpah, brazen insolence, in furthering that end. But brazen effrontery that is not aligned with God’s wishes is offensive and worthy of punishment. That is why the brazen can expect to end up enduring the torments of Gehinnom (whatever they may be), while the meek can expect to enjoy the tranquillity and bliss of life in the Garden of Eden.

A quite original reinterpretation of this pair of teachings comes from Rav Moshe Leib Sassover (I found this in Rabbi Tal Moshe Zwecker’s Ma’asei Avos). He starts with the premise, often found in chasidic writings, that there is more than one kind of righteous person, or tzaddik. For the purposes of his analysis here, we can divide tzaddikim into two classes: the reactive and the proactive. Both are righteous, but there’s a big difference between them. 

The reactive tzaddik does what he is told and gets on with his life as a sincere and committed servant of God. He spends his days and nights in prayer and praise, in contemplation of the Divine, and in studying Torah and imbibing its every shade and nuance of meaning. Not for him is the hustle and bustle of social interaction or the distraction of personal relationships: his thoughts soar towards the heavens and he troubles no-one. He is the very epitome of the meek man and it is he who will go to the Garden of Eden because there is nowhere else for him to go.

Contrast this with the proactive tzaddik. He too is a sincere and committed servant of God, but his orientation is towards his fellow man. He is pained by their failure to appreciate the beauty of Jewish practice and the noble ideals of the Torah. Not content with teaching by example, he goes after sinners and urges them to return to the fold, never losing hope and pursuing them even to the gates of Gehinnom in the hope of bringing them back.

This is a fascinating explanation of our mishnah, but it does invite an obvious question: where do we go, those of us who simply do our best to serve God on a daily basis and, being neither entirely reactive nor proactive, take our opportunities when we may?

For comments and discussion of this post on Facebook, click here