Tuesday 30 November 2021

Avot in Retrospect: a summary of last month's blogposts

In case you missed them, here's a list of items posted on Avot Today in November 2021:

Tuesday 30 November 2021: Festive feasts and divine retribution. As Jews throughout the world celebrate Chanukah by eating doughnuts, we take a look at Rabbi Akiva's surprising reference to a feast at the end of a long mishnah (3:20) dealing with paying God back what one owes Him.

Monday 22 November 2021: Going, going ... gone! Why Jewish tradition identifies so many different shades of old age.

Sunday 7 November 2021: Growing up to be a man -- of sortsThe fact that Avot doesn't make many explicit references to the bar mitzvah doesn't mean that it has nothing to say about the responsibilities of coming of age.

Monday 1 November 2021: A hard life and a hidden patriarch: Can the baraita at Avot 6:4 be concealing an allusion to Jacob?

*********************************

Avot Today blogposts for October 2021 here
Avot Today blogposts for September 2021 here
Avot Today blogposts for August 2021 here
Avot Today blogposts for July 2021 here
Avot Today blogposts for June 2021 here
Avot Today blogposts for May 2021 here

Festive feasts and divine retribution

At this time of year, to mark the Jewish festival of Chanukah, a great deal of festive eating is done. Chanukah may be regarded by many as a "minor festival", but this eating is an activity in which the vast majority of Jews appear to indulge, regardless of their level of religious observance and commitment. The main object of consumption in contemporary is the sufganiyah-- a species of doughnut on steroids [linguistic note: the word sufganiyah is rarely heard since it is the singular form of the noun: the word is normally found in the plural, sufganiyot, since that is how they are generally purchased and consumed].

All this feasting on doughnuts reminds me of a mishnah in Pirkei Avot in which feasting makes a surprising appearance. According to Rabbi Akiva (Avot 3:20):
"Everything is given on collateral, and a net is spread over all the living. The store is open, the storekeeper extends credit. The account-book lies open and the hand writes -- and all who wish to borrow may come and borrow. [But] the bailiffs make their rounds every day and exact payment from a person, whether he knows it or not. Their case is well founded, the judgement is a judgement of truth, and everything is prepared for the feast"
What does this feast have to do with the collection of debts? And who gets to attend it? Let's look a little further into this mystery.
One view of the promised banquet (Bartenura; commentary ascribed to Rashi) is that it is for everyone – the righteous and the wicked alike – on the strength of a promise that every Jew is entitled to a share in the World to Come – though the wicked may find that they need to purge themselves of the error of their ways before they get to receive their share. According to this mishnah, that purging is effected through the punishment element of the payback which is indicated through the Hebrew verb nifra’in.
An alternative view is that only the righteous will enjoy this feast: the wicked, having consumed their credit in their lifetime, are unable to attend since they will be destroyed for all eternity (per Rabbi Ovadyah Sforno). There is also a position that lies between the two: everyone gets to attend the banquet but only the righteous get to eat: the wicked sit and watch, grinding their teeth (per Rabbi Ya'akov Emden).
None of these explanations answer a fundamental question: what is the intended function of this reference within the mishnah?
All the other statements in this mishnah share a common function: that of getting man to change his behaviour for the better. The vague statement that “everything is prepared for the feast” does not. If a person is reminded that God keeps a record of everything he does, that he cannot cheat God and that he will be judged on the basis of his performance, he may be moved by these sobering reflections to behave better, or at least to think more carefully before continuing to behave badly. However, imagine your response if someone were to say to you, “watch out how you behave because, after you die and God judges you for good or bad, there is a banquet to which you may or may not be invited and at which you may be allowed to eat immediately, after a delay or not at all.” How big an impact might these words have as an incentive to do good or as a caution against doing bad? And what is the attraction of this banquet in an afterlife in which there is no eating or drinking in the physical sense, but instead a reward that we cannot comprehend: that of being bathed in the light of the Shechinah (an experience of one's awareness of God's presence)?
A possible answer lies in how we view the concept of post-mortem dining arrangements in Avot. This mishnah refers to a se'udah (translated here as “feast” but generally referring to any meal that marks or honours a special occasion), and a later mishnah taught in the name of Rabbi Ya’akov (at 4:21) refers to a traklin (which I translate as “banqueting hall” but also means “dining couch”). These are the only two mishnayot in Avot to make explicit reference to banqueting arrangements, but that is not the only thing they have in common.
In each case the “banquet” is in the World to Come; the banquet is contemplated within a wider context as something that follows a course of repentance/payback and good deeds, and the word used in relation to it has the same Hebrew root: letaken, “to prepare.”
It is submitted that both mishnayot can be read as conveying the same message: it is not the meal that matters here, but the preparation for it. If you want God’s judgement to be in your favour in the next World, you have to prepare for it in this one. When Rabbi Akiva teaches that “everything is prepared for the feast” he means that, if you follow his guidance in the earlier parts of the mishnah, it is you who have, figuratively speaking, prepared the “banquet” that awaits you – and that whether there is a banquet ahead of you or not depends on your efforts and your preparation.
More on food as a metaphor
The idea of a person behaving well or badly, being judged and then being sentenced in a manner that is appropriate to his conduct is also frequently conveyed in English by a sequence of food-related metaphors. While Rabbis Akiva and Ya’akov talk of feasts, we speak of a person “getting his just desserts.” One cannot have unlimited credit and expect that he will never have to pay it back since “you can’t have your cake and eat it.” Where a person performs a deed in a clumsy or unnecessarily complex manner, he is said to have “made a meal of it” or, depending on his locality, to have “made a hash of it.” If he vigorously asserts that he has done no wrong but God’s judgement goes against him, he is obliged to “eat humble pie.” Some people’s World to Come is better than that of others: this is not because “that’s the way the cookie crumbles” but because Divine justice takes into account things that we cannot know or see. Since preparation for one’s World to Come can only be done during one’s lifetime, someone who “doesn’t care a fig” about God’s judgement while he lives won’t get a chance to remedy the situation after he dies since no-one gets “a second bite at the cherry.” When he sees the rewards of others, which are denied to him, his attitude may be one of “sour grapes” and he may be “stewing in his own juice.” In each of these cases, the use of the metaphor describes a person’s conduct or attitude: what is eaten, and whether it is eaten or not, are matters of no consequence.
Photograph: doughnuts from Modiin, the locality from which the Hasmonean uprising against the Greeks was launched.

Tuesday 23 November 2021

Going, going ... gone!

Rabbi Shimon ben Netanel (Avot 2:13) advises that the right path for a person to follow is that which results from his looking ahead and being able to identify issues and events before they occur. I failed miserably in this regard earlier this week when I walked unsuspectingly into a 70th birthday party that my English family had organised for me a full five weeks before my actual birthdate.

While we talk of people having a "significant birthday", in real-world terms a birthday is only an arbitrary calendar event, and being five weeks short of 70 is, or should be, just as important to someone who achieves that age as is his or her 70th birthday. Be that as it may, this event got me thinking a bit about Avot and age.

To many younger people, old age is old age and there is little reason to divide the elderly into separate age-based categories. In truth, the elderly are not a problem because they are old but because of their capabilities. What matters is whether they are healthy or unwell, independent or in need of help from others. Apart from the exceptional physical and intellectual vigour that Moses retained till his final day, the Tanach offers few rosy prospects ahead of those who are poised to enter what is now euphemistically termed the Third Age.

In the Torah no specific right or duty devolves on to anyone who lives beyond fifty, though the regular mitzvot continue to apply. The Book of Psalms offers the prospect of a 70-year lifespan, rising to 80 for those who have gevurah (a word that connotes not just physical but also psychological strength). Yehudah ben Teima, in Avot 5:25, goes beyond the psalmist's terminal point, dividing the years of old age into five categories. The fourth and fifth—which might unkindly be termed the zone of dotage—are discussed later while the first three, which can be summarized as “know,” “show” and “slow,” are considered here:

 Sixty: this is the onset of old age. Around this time many people know and appreciate that they “may not be quite what they used to be” but nonetheless carry on with their lives, sometimes even turning their thoughts to what they might do to ensure their comfort and security as they advance in years and cease to work for a living;

 Seventy: the mishnah describes this as “white-haired old age,” the time when a person appears to be getting old in the eyes of others: ageing shows as hair turns grey or white, wrinkles multiply, it takes more effort to get up out of a comfortable chair or climb a flight of steps. Mental acuity may well be unimpaired, but memory may fail a bit. Putting a positive spin on this, an older person has far more memories to preserve than does than a younger one—and the task of counting one’s blessings is bound to take longer when one has more blessings to count.

 Eighty: this is the age of “inner strength.” As the body’s physical performance declines, a person noticeably slows down, often generating impatience and annoyance in others who expect swifter responses. Inner strength and self-discipline are demanded if this person is to control the urge to complain about his or her aches, pains and general health and about the behaviour and attitudes of younger people. Self-discipline is also essential in order to suppress the increasingly irresistible urge to loosen natural inhibitions, indulging in socially inappropriate actions and speech. An alternative view (Rabbi Menachem Mordechai Frankel-Teomim, Be’er HaAvot) is that at 80 a person can command substantial spiritual strength, being increasingly free from the distraction of physical desires.

Going, going …

Ninety is the age of being bent over. A person’s physical and mental resources may still be intact, but the amount of effort required in order to use them may be disproportionately high. Many Torah scholars have reached the nineties and beyond, possibly more through their love of God, a stubborn determination to continue learning and their passionate enjoyment of it than through any other cause. Having said that, for the majority of people who reach that age, life imposes stiff challenges as they often struggle to combat the effects of deteriorating eyesight and hearing, seriously failing memory, chronic and irreversible physical conditions and, perhaps most sadly, the loneliness that comes from the irreplaceable loss of friends and peers.

In the eyes of one commentator, such a person has simply run out of life and is ripe for the grave. Another view which, while positive, is not for everyone, is that this person is bent over in constant prayer.

An alternative version of this Mishnah reads as לָשֽׁוּחַ (lashu’ach, “to be stooped”) as לְָשְׂוּחַ (lasu’ach, “to meditate”). The idea of a nonagenarian stepping back from active life and slipping into a world of restful meditation may be quite appealing, but the same word lasu’ach is double-edged: it also suggests engaging in idle chatter, with the connotation that at 90, when a person no longer has the strength to sin with his body, the only way one can meaningfully sin is through forbidden or inappropriate speech and it against this that one must guard oneself.

… gone

Reaching the age of one hundred is still regarded as an achievement, though there has been a small but steady increase in the number of centenarians over recent decades. The United Nations estimated that in 2012 the worldwide population of people over the age of 100 stood at around 316,600.

For as long as a Jew is alive he is fully bound by the laws of the Torah and remains obligated to learn it. However, even if he is active at this advanced age, bearing in mind his fragility and feebleness it is advisable for him to step back from serving as a Dayan (per Rabbi Frankel-Teomim again). He should also make every effort to repent, not because he should expect to die any day but because, if he is no longer in full command of his faculties, his repentance has little meaning (per Rabbi Yitzchak Magriso, Me’am Lo’ez).

It would be great to hear the views of some of the older readers of this blog as to how they understand this mishnah in the light of their own experiences. Do let us know!

Sunday 7 November 2021

Growing up to be a man ... of sorts

As I write these words I find myself in the happy and (for me) unusual position of occupying a space between the barmitzvah of two grandsons whose coming-of-age celebrations take place on successive weeks.

Pirkei Avot notes without comment (at 5:25) that a male becomes formally subject to the laws of the Torah once he attains the age of 13. But is that all that can be said on the subject? I think not.

Earlier in Avot (2:6) Hillel teaches that "in a place where there is no man, one should strive to be a man". This is generally understood as an exhortation to rank-and-file Jewry to stand up and be counted when need be, to take a necessary initiative or to seize the reins of communal leadership when no-one else is man enough to do so. Strangely enough, some of the most obvious examples of this maxim being put into practice involve women (Zipporah, Deborah, Esther), not men -- but that's a topic for another day.

It occurred to me that Hillel's advice applies to barmitzvah boys too. Yes, once they reach the age of responsibility they are "men" -- but no, they are still not yet the finished article and from now on the task of completion lies with them too, and no longer solely with their parents.

For me this reality is symbolised by the appearance of almost every barmitzvah boy on the day he is first called to a reading of the Torah. In circles where suits are still worn, he will nearly always be wearing a suit that is a little bit too big for him (since buying a suit for a boy going through a growing spurt is an exercise in shooting at a moving target); his shirt collar too will hang a little loosely around his neck. This is a visible sign of our expectation that he still has some way to go -- and we know that this is true not only in physical terms but also in his emotional, intellectual and spiritual growth.

The barmitzvah boy truly is a man -- but only an "entry-level" man with much ahead of him in terms of growing into the fully-fledged mature adult we all wish him to be. So, to give a little tweak to Hillel's teaching, we can read it as an address to every barmitzvah boy: in the very place where you are standing -- that is the place from which you must strive to fulfil your potential and be the man that is still concealed within you. If you look into the mirror and don't see the man you want to be, now is the time to begin work on becoming that man.

Monday 1 November 2021

A hard life and a hidden patriarch

An anonymous baraita in the sixth chapter of Avot (Avot 6:4) praises a tough, ascetic lifestyle as the path to happiness through Torah study. It reads:
This is the way of Torah: eat bread with salt; drink water in moderation; sleep on the ground; live a life of hardship and toil in Torah. If you do so, "you will be happy and it will be good for you” —happy in this world, good to you in the World to Come.
Much has been written on this prescription for happiness the hard way and many questions have been asked on it: for example, is it addressed to the rich as a message that they should change their ways or to the poor as a message of consolation? Is it the exclusive way of the Torah or are there others? Does it apply for all time or was it specific to the era of the Tanna who authored it? Should it be taken literally or is it steeped in metaphor and symbolism?
This post considers a novel question: is there a subtext waiting to be discovered?
Let us conjecture that this baraita has someone in particular in mind, a role model (as it were) whose life fits the parameters of happiness laid down here. After all, the demands it makes suggest that, if it refers to anyone, that person must be possessed of extraordinary human qualities.
I venture to suggest there is some textual evidence in favour of this teaching pointing us to the patriarch Jacob. How is this so?
The Torah describes Jacob as “a quiet man, dwelling in tents,” which the commentators have traditionally taken to mean that he was a man who conscientiously studied at the yeshivah of Shem and Ever. We also know are that he slept on the ground, that he could manage without sleep and that he lived a life of great hardship. Was he happy? His final sentiments were those of a man who died content in the knowledge that he was not only reunited with his beloved son Joseph but saw his grandsons too —a formula for peace of mind.
The only element of this baraita to which the Torah makes no specific allusion is that of drinking water in moderation, but water in moderation is part of his heritage: the blessing that Isaac gives Jacob, assuming him to be Esau, is that God should give him “the dew of Heaven.” Though dew is also a blessing, it is a moderate one since its impact is more limited than that of rain.
A further hint that Jacob is the archetypical Torah scholar of our baraita is provided by the source of the proof verse: the 128th chapter of the Book of Psalms. Virtually every part of this short psalm (it has just six verses) points straight to him. Let us look at it in its entirety. The text of the psalm is bold:
1. A song of ascents [It is Jacob who dreams of the ladder with its ascending and descending angels]. Blessed are all who fear God [Jacob fears God ], who walk in his ways [Jacob literally goes wherever God tells him ].
2. You will eat the fruit of your labour [Jacob toiled hard as a shepherd ]; you will be happy and it will be good for you [his flocks and sheep-breeding programme made him a remarkably wealthy man].
3. Your wife [Jacob’s wife Leah, from whom the psalmist King David was descended] will be like a fruitful vine [“fruitful vine” is part of Jacob’s blessing to Joseph; the term “fruitful vine” is also symbolic of one’s children being without blemish, like those of Jacob ] within your house [Leah being one of the four “women in the tent” in Horayot 10b]; your sons [12 in total] will be like olive shoots around your table.
4. Thus is the man blessed who fears God [see first verse].
5. May God bless you from Zion [God blesses Jacob on Mount Moriah] all the days of your life [God says: “I’m with you, I will not leave you”]; may you see the prosperity of Jerusalem,
6. And may you live to see your children's children [Jacob lives to see a total of 54 grandchildren and great-grandchildren ]. Peace be upon Israel [God changes Jacob’s name to “Israel”].
It is the second verse of this psalm that is the proof verse for this baraita.
It is acknowledged that there is no tradition that connects this psalm to Jacob. However, anyone seeking a take-away message from this baraita could do worse than seek to emulate at least some of this man’s outstanding character and qualities.
Artwork: Jacob tending Laban's flock, after Castiglione: landscape with sheep, goats, and cows standing at a watering place, on the left Jacob brandishing a rod, and a young woman riding a donkey by his side. c.1743/63. Original with the British Museum. 

Avot in Retrospect: a summary of last month's blogposts

In case you missed them, here's a list of items posted on Avot Today in October 2021:

Thursday 28 October 2021: Judging others-- again: are we really supposed to judge others favourably and give them the benefit of the doubt?

Wednesday 27 October 2021: When push comes to shove: how should one view the annoying and inconvenient behaviour of people who try to push past one in doorways?

Monday 25 October 2021: The ages of man -- and woman? In this guest post for Judaism Reclaimed, we ask again why Avot contains no female-friendly equivalent to Avot 5:25 on the ages of man.

Thursday 21 October 2021: The paradigm test: the binding of IsaacIf God knows that Abraham will pass the test of being told to sacrifice his son, why test him at all?

Tuesday 19 October 2021: Back to work -- but do you love it? Shemaya teaches us to love work. It is not however clear what he means.

Friday 15 October 2021: Thanks for the thank-you: Writing "thank-you" letters has more to do with Pirkei Avot than one might immediately imagine.

Wednesday 13 October 2021: Getting someone else's rewardAvot 5:3 mentions the reward scooped by Abraham for the few good deeds of the ten generations before him. How can this be so?

Monday 11 October 2021: A spade or an axe? Take your pickAvot 4:7 warns that using the Torah for one's own self-glorification and financial advantage is wrong. All agree what the mishnah means, but there is no consensus as to how it should be translated into English.

Friday 8 October 2021: Free will and floods: a lesson from NoahDoes Avot 5:2 have more to tell us about the need of repentance than of God's patience?

Monday 4 October 2021: Greeting others with genuine kindness: what is expected of us? In Avot 3:16 Rabbi Yishmael calls for us to be happy when we greet other people. While he imposes no limitations on this requirement, others do. Are they right to do so?

Friday 1 October 2021: Creating worlds with words: Avot 5:1 describes how the world was created with ten utterances. What sort of world is the mishnah talking about?

*********************************

Avot Today blogposts for September 2021 here
Avot Today blogposts for August 2021 here
Avot Today blogposts for July 2021 here
Avot Today blogposts for June 2021 here
Avot Today blogposts for May 2021 here
Avot Today blogposts for April 2021 here