In recent weeks I've made frequent use of a commentary on Pirkei Avot, Tiferet Tzion, by Rabbi Yitchak Ze'ev Yadler, which I picked up for 10 shekels in a street sale of unwanted and abandoned books. Before moving on to sample the approach to Avot another commentator, I'm posting two final pieces based on Rabbi Yadler's book which deal with different mishnayot but share a common theme. Here's the first:
The Talmud (Berachot
35b) brings a famous argument between Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai and Rabbi
Yishmael as to whether it is better to sit and learn Torah full time, as Rabbi
Shimon contends, or to work when it is time to work and learn when it is time
to learn, as Rabbi Yishmael maintains. The passage, in full, reads like this.
Our Rabbis taught: “And you shall
gather in your corn” (Deut. 11:14). What is to be learnt from these words?
Since it says: “This book of the law shall not depart from your mouth” (Joshua
1:8), I might have thought that this instruction is to be taken literally, so
it says: “And you shall gather in your corn”, which implies that you should
combine the study of them [i.e. the words of the Torah] with a worldly
occupation. This is the view of Rabbi Yishmael.
Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai says: “Is
that possible? If a man ploughs in the ploughing season, sows in the sowing
season, reaps in the reaping season, threshes in the threshing season, and
winnows in the windy season, what will become of the Torah? No! But when Israel
perform the will of the Omnipresent, their work is performed by others, as it
says: ‘And strangers shall stand and feed your flocks…’ (Isaiah 61:5). and when
Israel do not perform the will of the Omnipresent their work is carried out by
themselves, as it says: ‘And you will gather in your corn’. Not only that, but the work of others will also
be done by them, as it says: ‘And you will serve your enemy…’ (Deut. 28:48).
Said Abaye: “Many have followed the advice of Ishmael, and it has worked well;
others have followed Rabbi Simeon bar Yochai and it has not been successful”.
As I mention
in my book, this argument continues even today and both sides can cite the
authoritative support of great sages on whom they rely.
Anyone taking the teachings in Pirkei Avot as a whole will find that this great chasm between the “nothing but Torah” and “Torah in its right time” camps is reflected there too. Much of the sixth perek is in effect an extended paean of praise for Torah and an affirmation of its rightful place at the summit of Jewish endeavour. Against that, Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel asserts that it is not learning but action that is the objective of Torah study (Avot 1:17) and Rabban Gamliel, son of Rabbi Yehudah HaNasi, praises the combination of Torah learning with a worldly occupation (Avot 2:2) on the ground that it is this that causes all sin to be forgotten; he adds that, in the absence of some sort of worldly occupation, one’s Torah learning is batelah (“of no effect”).
Commenting
on what appears to be Rabban Gamliel’s harsh assessment of Rabbi Shimon bar
Yochai’s position, Rabbi Yitchak Tzevi Yadler draws our attention to another
mishnah (Avot 3:6) in which Rabbi Nechunya ben Hakanah promises that anyone who opts for Rabbi
Shimon bar Yochai’s stern regime and takes upon himself the yoke of Torah will
find that two other yokes—those of government and of having to make a
living—will be removed from him.
According
to Rabbi Yadler, when Rabban Gamliel advises taking up a worldly occupation as
well as learning Torah, he is not at odds with Rabbi Nechunya ben Hakanah. That
is because Rabban Gamliel’s advice is addressed to the ordinary Jew in the
street, as it were, and not the night-and-day Torah student. For the person
whose head is totally immersed in his learning there is (or should at any rate
be) no need to forget sin since such a person shouldn’t be thinking about it in
the first place, never mind closing his Gemara and wandering off in order to
commit it. But for the person who only studies Torah at the times fixed for
doing so, the Torah content of his day is insufficient to blot out
inappropriate thoughts and actions entirely and that is why it is good for him
to engage in an worldly occupation as well as learn.
But what of
those people who occupy themselves totally in Torah? They are the people for
whom, Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai asserts, everything will be done by others.
Going back
to Rabban Gamliel’s mishnah, we can understand it in two ways. One is that
“Torah plus worldly occupation” means that a person learns and works. The other
is that, while one person learns, it is not he but another person who works, in
order to meet the needs of the one who is in learning. If we have a situation
in which one person is ostensibly learning but no other person is working to
meet his needs, we have “Torah without a worldly occupation” and it is this
that appears to testify against Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai’s promise. As Rabbi
Yadler puts it, there is, Heaven forfend, a chillul Hashem (a
desecration of God’s name) because people will look at a person who dedicates
his entire life and energy to learning Torah, receiving no support from others,
and say “Is this the Torah and is this its reward?”